Oregon Court of Appeals says voter-approved firearms measure is constitutional

The Oregon Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of Ballot Measure 114, which imposes stricter regulations on firearm purchases, including a prohibition on magazines holding more than ten rounds and a requirement for purchasers to obtain permits. This unanimous decision reverses a prior ruling by a lower court that found the measure unconstitutional. Supporters of Measure 114, including gun safety advocates, welcomed the court's ruling as a reflection of the voters' intent, highlighting that it aims to close loopholes that could allow firearms to be purchased without comprehensive background checks. Opponents, however, criticized the measure as an infringement on constitutional rights, with some rural communities expressing significant opposition. Notably, the measure will not be enacted immediately, allowing for a 35-day period during which opponents can appeal to the Oregon Supreme Court.

The ruling comes as the Oregon Legislature prepares to address various gun safety issues, including potential amendments to Measure 114. State Attorney General Dan Rayfield emphasized the importance of balancing the rights of responsible gun owners with the need to reduce gun violence. The ongoing debate underscores the contentious nature of gun regulation in Oregon.