Countywide wetlands update containing contested amendment approved 3-2

Snohomish, WALocal News

The Snohomish County Council approved a bill that embeds a contentious amendment reducing protections for wetlands. Council members Jared Mead, Sam Low, and Nate Nehring supported the measure, while Megan Dunn and Strom Peterson opposed it due to environmental concerns. Dunn emphasized the amendment's risks, stating that it could undermine the original ordinance's intent to protect clean water and wildlife. Public hearings revealed significant opposition, with over 30 attendees demanding stronger safeguards. Amendment 3 allows buffer reductions around wetlands, decreasing protections from 15% to 10% and potentially impacting thousands of acres of riparian forest.

Critics argue this amendment is inconsistent with scientific recommendations. State Fish and Wildlife officials estimate that the changes could threaten 15,000 acres of habitat. Environmental advocates, including Kristin Kelly of Futurewise, assert that the amendment undermines essential conservation efforts.

Related Articles

Take the Next Step has more services than you may realize

Take the Next Step (TTNS) in Monroe provides a wide range of resources, serving 60 to 70 people weekly with community dinners. Founded in 2004 by Donna Olson, TTNS offers vital support for families, teens, and the unhoused, aiming to connect them with essential services.

Everett council candidate Niko Battle faces eligibility challenge in court

A court challenge seeks to disqualify Niko Battle from the Everett City Council ballot, claiming they do not reside at the address listed on their voter registration. Resident John Dimas filed the challenge after the apartment manager stated she had no record of Battle in her lease records. Battle must appear before a judge on September 9 to address the allegations.

Complaints of retributive coach at Jackson robotics denied in district investigations

Parents James and Shelly Lee accuse Jackson High's robotics team of retaliatory actions against their child, who was removed from the team after criticizing its operations. Investigations by the school district have denied these claims, while an insider alleges that adult mentors dominate the robot-building process, undermining the educational purpose of the program.