Reader viewopinion Yes on RFA annexation a response to former councilmembers commentary

Adam Cornell's response to former Edmonds Councilmember Dave Teitzel's commentary on the Regional Fire Authority (RFA) annexation vote underscores the importance of this decision for the community. While he respects Teitzel's perspective, Cornell identifies several key points that support a "yes" vote, including the financial distress facing Edmonds and the high-quality fire/EMS services provided by South County Fire (SCF). He argues that current tax rates for Edmonds residents are lower than those of neighboring cities, suggesting that annexation would normalize these rates. Cornell counters Teitzel's concerns about the tax burden, highlighting that low-income seniors could see significant property tax reductions if annexation is approved. He addresses the assertion that other options were not considered, pointing to a comprehensive analysis by Fitch and Associates that found annexation to be the most cost-effective solution.

Furthermore, Cornell mentions that checks conducted by competing consulting firms failed to find faults in the Fitch Report, reinforcing the credibility of the annexation proposal. By advocating for a "yes" vote, Cornell believes that annexation presents the best value for all Edmonds residents, ensuring first-rate emergency services. His insights aim to provide clarity and encourage informed decision-making among voters.