Learn More About Wildfire Risk, Safety At Two May Meetings

Snohomish, WALocal News

Snohomish County will hold two open house meetings in May to introduce its first Community Wildfire Protection Plan. The sessions aim to educate residents about wildfire risks and preparedness strategies. Lucia Schmit, the director of Emergency Management, emphasized the importance of keeping families and pets safe. The gatherings are scheduled for May 15 in Arlington and May 22 in Startup, running from 5:30 p. m.

to 7:30 p. m. Attendees will engage with first responders and view maps detailing wildfire risk in the area. Approximately 130,000 residents, or over 15% of the county’s population, live in high-risk wildland urban interface zones. The county's wildfire season typically spans from early July through fall, with the 2022 Bolt Creek Fire highlighting the growing intensity of these events.

Residents are encouraged to visit www. bit. ly/SnoCo_CWPP for more information on the Community Wildfire Protection Plan.

Related Articles

Snohomish County Extends Outdoor Burning Ban

Snohomish County has extended its Stage 1 outdoor burning ban until September 28, 2025, prohibiting residential burning except for recreational and cooking fires. The ban is a precaution against wildfire risks, particularly amid anticipated dry weather conditions. A Red Flag Warning will halt all outdoor burning if issued.

Snohomish County Extends Outdoor Burning Ban

Snohomish County extends its Stage 1 outdoor burning ban until September 28, 2025, due to high fire danger. The ban prohibits all residential burning in unincorporated areas and specific cities, allowing only recreational and cooking fires under strict conditions. Public safety officials urge caution with outdoor fires amid ongoing dry weather risks.

Appeals court upholds decision against SRFR Firefighter 8

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's decision against Snohomish Regional Fire & Rescue, siding with the agency in a religious discrimination case involving eight firefighters who refused the COVID-19 vaccine. The firefighters, who sought back pay after being placed on unpaid leave, argued that the agency failed to provide reasonable accommodations for their religious beliefs. Attorneys representing the firefighters criticized the ruling, stating it jeopardizes religious freedom protections.