Applicants sought for Public Safety Board Vacancy

Snohomish, WALocal News

The City of Snohomish is seeking applicants to fill two vacancies on its Public Safety Board, with a deadline for applications set for April 2, 2025, at 4 PM. This board serves an advisory capacity, playing a vital role in supporting the City Council's public safety initiatives. Key areas of focus include developing Neighborhood Watch programs, enhancing emergency preparedness, and promoting pedestrian safety. Active community engagement is essential, as board members are expected to participate in various events addressing seasonal and emergent safety issues. All positions are voluntary, and candidates must reside within the city's urban growth boundary to ensure local representation.

The selected appointee’s term will commence on May 1, 2025. For additional information about the board's responsibilities and to apply, individuals can visit the Snohomish city website. This initiative reflects the city's commitment to fostering a safe and engaged community.

Related Articles

Snohomish County Extends Outdoor Burning Ban

Snohomish County has extended its Stage 1 outdoor burning ban until September 28, 2025, prohibiting residential burning except for recreational and cooking fires. The ban is a precaution against wildfire risks, particularly amid anticipated dry weather conditions. A Red Flag Warning will halt all outdoor burning if issued.

Snohomish County Extends Outdoor Burning Ban

Snohomish County extends its Stage 1 outdoor burning ban until September 28, 2025, due to high fire danger. The ban prohibits all residential burning in unincorporated areas and specific cities, allowing only recreational and cooking fires under strict conditions. Public safety officials urge caution with outdoor fires amid ongoing dry weather risks.

Appeals court upholds decision against SRFR Firefighter 8

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's decision against Snohomish Regional Fire & Rescue, siding with the agency in a religious discrimination case involving eight firefighters who refused the COVID-19 vaccine. The firefighters, who sought back pay after being placed on unpaid leave, argued that the agency failed to provide reasonable accommodations for their religious beliefs. Attorneys representing the firefighters criticized the ruling, stating it jeopardizes religious freedom protections.