Californias AG is trying to put a prosecutor in prison. Its not Brooke Jenkins.

The article explores the legal troubles of former prosecutors Diana Teran and Brooke Jenkins in California, both of whom are under scrutiny for their handling of sensitive information. Teran faces felony charges for accessing public records via a sheriff's department database, potentially leading to over six years in prison. Conversely, Jenkins accessed a confidential rap sheet and forwarded it to a personal email but has not been charged, raising concerns about selective legal enforcement by Attorney General Rob Bonta. George Gascón, former district attorney, has expressed bewilderment over the disparity in treatment between the two cases, suggesting that Jenkins's actions were more severe. Legal experts, including UC Berkeley's law dean, support this viewpoint, questioning the rationale behind the Attorney General's decisions.

The article underscores the potential political motivations behind these legal actions, as Jenkins's case was tied to a successful recall campaign against DA Chesa Boudin. This situation highlights broader issues of accountability and the application of anti-hacking statutes in prosecutorial contexts. Ultimately, the differing outcomes for Teran and Jenkins raise critical questions about legal consistency and political influence in California's justice system.