Prop. K opponents to sue city, 5 supes over Great Highway closure

The recent passage of Proposition K, which aims to close San Francisco's Upper Great Highway to cars in favor of park development, has triggered a legal response from its critics. Opponents, including former District 7 candidate Matt Boschetto and local business owner Albert Chow, plan to file a lawsuit targeting the city and five supervisors who supported the measure. They argue that Prop. K is legally invalid, citing state traffic control laws that preempt local voter actions regarding road closures. Additionally, the plaintiffs contend that the city neglected to adhere to the California Environmental Quality Act by failing to produce an environmental impact report.

The lawsuit highlights discrepancies in the proposition, particularly its provision for certain vehicles to continue using the highway, which contradicts the voters' intent. The Planning Department's claim that CEQA does not apply to measures submitted by supervisors is also under scrutiny. As the final day for car traffic approaches on March 14, the lawsuit reflects broader tensions surrounding urban planning and community involvement. The outcome will not only affect local traffic patterns but also set a precedent for future initiatives regarding public spaces and environmental compliance.