Paul Flores Files Second Appeal of Conviction In 1996 Murder of Kristin Smart

Paul Flores is appealing his 2022 conviction for Kristin Smart's murder, citing several trial errors that he believes compromised the fairness of the proceedings. His attorney, Solomon Wollack, contends that a witness's testimony about drugging was inadmissible, as the individual was not an expert on such substances. Furthermore, the appeal points to a juror's emotional outbursts during critical testimony, suggesting these disruptions could have influenced the jury's decision-making process. The prosecution's case relied heavily on circumstantial evidence, with no physical remains of Smart ever found. Testimony indicated that Flores had a history of inappropriate behavior toward women, raising questions about his character.

The appeal also references the earlier trial of Flores's father, Ruben, who was acquitted of being an accessory to the crime. This case has drawn attention due to the long duration before trial and the ongoing search for justice in unsolved murders. As the appeal process unfolds, it could have significant ramifications for both Flores and the legal system's handling of cold cases.