Should Alameda County eliminate pepper spray from juvenile detention?

Oakland, CALocal News

Dieudonné Brou, now 37, shared his traumatic experiences with pepper spray during his childhood in juvenile detention at a town hall organized by Urban Peace Movement. Advocates, including Brou, called for Alameda County to eliminate pepper spray, emphasizing its negative psychological impact on youth. They proposed alternatives focused on restorative justice and rehabilitation, such as mentoring and counseling. Assistant Chief Probation Officer Shauna Conner acknowledged the community's concerns but defended the use of pepper spray, asserting it is governed by strict policies. She mentioned a significant investment of over $119 million for youth and family programs in the next fiscal year.

This funding aims to support alternatives to incarceration and promote healing. The ongoing debate highlights the need for systemic changes in how the justice system treats young people. Advocates argue that fostering trust between correctional staff and youth is crucial for effective rehabilitation.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.