Oakland moves forward with plan for speed cameras as part of pilot program

Oakland, CALocal News

Oakland's Public Works and Transportation committee has approved plans for 18 speed cameras as part of a pilot program to improve public safety. This initiative, inspired by San Francisco's already operational cameras, targets areas with high rates of speeding, including Claremont Avenue, where over 600 drivers exceed the speed limit daily. The program's fines will start at $50 for those driving more than 11 miles per hour over the limit. City estimates indicate that 10,000 vehicles exceed the posted speed limit on Hegenberger Road regularly, suggesting significant revenue potential. While City Councilmember Noel Gallo advocates for safer streets, some residents worry about privacy and the validity of photo-based ticketing.

The Oakland City Council is set to vote on the final proposal next week. If approved, installation will commence, with enforcement expected to begin before the year's end. This program reflects a growing trend in urban traffic management aimed at reducing reckless driving and enhancing community safety.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.