Family is at the heart of Roses on Adeline

Oakland, CALocal News

Roses on Adeline Bar & Kitchen in South Berkeley, owned by Rose Soffa Clarke and her architect parents, embodies a family-oriented dining experience. The restaurant, named for "flowers on Adeline," reflects the family dynamics, including lighthearted disagreements over its name, with Rose preferring the plural form. Initially constrained by a Type 48 liquor license, which limited patrons to those over 21, the restaurant faced backlash from families seeking to enjoy meals together. Since its opening in November 2020, the family navigated renovation challenges, incorporating their architectural skills into the restaurant's design. Soffa Clarke's childhood memories of family gatherings and shared meals fueled her ambition to own a restaurant, despite not attending culinary school.

Her experience working in various kitchens solidified her passion for cooking. The restaurant aims to respond to community needs while creating a welcoming, relaxed atmosphere. As they adapt to feedback, the family remains committed to fostering connections through food and hospitality.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.