Why is Alameda Countys new DA undoing death penalty case reviews?

Oakland, CALocal News

Ursula Jones Dickson, appointed as Alameda County's new district attorney, has initiated moves to reverse the resentencing reviews of death penalty cases that were started by former DA Pamela Price. These reviews aimed to address systemic racial and religious bias in jury selections that led to the wrongful sentencing of individuals, resulting in 20 prisoners being removed from death row. Defense attorney Brian Pomerantz accused Jones Dickson of politically motivated actions that seek to obscure decades of prosecutorial misconduct. The current DA's team has criticized the previous administration for alleged inaccuracies in their reviews and a lack of proper victim outreach during the resentencing process. Jones Dickson has publicly stated her obligation to review each case individually and refrained from commenting on ongoing matters.

This week’s hearings revealed extensive evidence of past misconduct, including discriminatory practices against Black and Jewish jurors. The conflict underscores the challenges in addressing historical injustices within the criminal justice system. As the debate continues, many await the outcomes of pending resentencing petitions in Alameda County.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.