5 years after George Floyd's murder, Oakland's MACRO offers a different kind of response

Oakland, CALocal News

This Sunday marks five years since George Floyd's murder, a pivotal event that led to widespread protests against police violence and racial injustice. In response, Oakland launched the Mobile Assistance Community Responders of Oakland (MACRO) in 2022 to manage non-violent, non-emergency calls. The program has expanded to include 28 staff members trained in crisis response and community engagement. In 2024, MACRO responded to 2,500 incidents, showcasing its commitment to reducing the burden on Oakland's 911 system. Despite its successes, MACRO faces limitations, such as not being able to enter homes or respond to armed situations, which has drawn some criticism.

Community members view the team's empathetic approach as a crucial way to build trust within the community. Oakland Fire Chief Damon Covington believes MACRO could become a cornerstone of the city’s public safety framework over the next several years. This initiative reflects a broader trend toward reimagining public safety, even as challenges remain in fulfilling its promises.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.