City unions urge Oakland to get police overtime spending under control

Oakland, CALocal News

Oakland's budget allocates $33. 6 million for police overtime in the upcoming fiscal year, despite persistent concerns over financial management. City officials assert that this funding is vital for adequate police response and operational integrity, given staffing levels around 500, far below the 877 officers recommended for proper service delivery. Critics, including city worker unions, argue that the city is falling into a costly pattern of overspending on police overtime, which they believe could lead to cuts in other departments. A recent report suggests that Oakland will spend $55 million this year on police overtime, covering over 400,000 hours.

This comes after an earlier announcement to cut $25 million from the overtime budget, which was later revised due to “operational constraints. ” Officials claim they are working to reduce overtime by 25% and are tracking spending through planned requests and quarterly reports. However, it remains uncertain how effective these measures will be. The ongoing debate highlights the tension between public safety funding and overall city budget health.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.