Alameda County taxpayers group settles lawsuit with Oakland over 2022 mayoral election

Oakland, CALocal News

Oakland settled a lawsuit with the Alameda County Taxpayers’ Association for $207,812, addressing allegations of election rule violations during the 2022 mayoral election. The City Council approved the settlement, which includes funding for attorney fees and commitments to improve records retention and election procedures. Attorney Marleen Sacks expressed satisfaction with the outcome, despite the court dismissing major demands, including the invalidation of the election results. The lawsuit stemmed from miscommunication by the city clerk regarding nomination deadlines, which caused confusion among candidates. Sacks alleged that three candidates, including Sheng Thao, missed the deadline due to the clerk's erroneous instructions.

While Oakland acknowledged mistakes, it asserted that the election's integrity was not compromised. Deputy City Attorney Luke Edwards stated that accepting late paperwork did not negatively impact voters' rights. The city plans to implement procedural improvements to prevent future issues.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.