Oakland violence prevention programs defunded by Trump administration

Oakland, CALocal News

The U. S. Department of Justice announced cuts of $811 million in grants, which will severely impact violence prevention and intervention programs in Oakland and Alameda County. Organizations like the National Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (NICJR) risk losing approximately $3 million in funding over the next few years, according to Executive Director David Muhammad. NICJR’s grants focus on gun violence reduction and youth development programs.

BOSS, a nonprofit based in Berkeley, will lose a $641,050 grant designated for mental health services at its trauma recovery center. CEO Donald Frazier described the funding cuts as “policy violence” against the community. Grant recipients have a 30-day window to appeal the terminations. The Justice Department plans to redirect funding priorities towards law enforcement and combating violent crime. Critics argue that these cuts undermine programs that improve public safety without conflicting with the administration's goals.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.