Antioch murderer has new theory explaining why he stabbed his lawyer during trial: His alter ego ‘Ashton’ did it

Oakland, CALocal News

Ramello Randle, the Antioch murderer, has introduced a controversial new defense theory, asserting that his alter ego, "Ashton," was responsible for the stabbing of his lawyer during his trial. This shocking revelation comes after a psychiatrist, employed by the defense, concluded that Randle might be fabricating his claims about mental illness. The attack on his lawyer raises critical questions about the nature of courtroom violence and the psychological challenges faced by defendants. As the trial unfolds, Randle's defense team is likely to focus on proving his mental incompetence during the incident, complicating the legal proceedings. The courtroom drama has captivated local media, drawing attention to the broader implications of mental health in the criminal justice system.

Randle's assertion of an alter ego adds an intriguing layer to the case, prompting discussions about identity and accountability. The incident not only reflects the personal turmoil of Randle but also serves as a stark reminder of the potential for violence within legal settings. As the case continues, it will be essential for the court to navigate the delicate balance between mental health assessments and legal responsibility.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.