Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

Judge Maria Morga of Alameda County Superior Court ruled against Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, citing a lack of evidence for threats or harm. Duffey alleged that Scott's videos, which accused him of bribery and receiving federal immunity, were damaging his reputation and job prospects. In response, Scott asserted his First Amendment rights during the hearing and expressed intentions to file a First Amendment lawsuit against Duffey and other city officials. Morga noted that Duffey could seek other legal remedies, such as a defamation lawsuit, for the accusations made in Scott's videos. Scott's allegations included claims of Duffey taking a $250,000 bribe, which Duffey vehemently denied, stating he never engaged in corruption or received immunity.

The court's decision reflects ongoing tensions between political figures and activists in Oakland, particularly following Scott's involvement in the recall campaign against former Mayor Sheng Thao. The case underscores the complexities of free speech and legal boundaries in political discourse. Federal prosecutors have not implicated Duffey in any wrongdoing related to the allegations made by Scott.