Why Oakland residents are pushing back against street upgrades in Chinatown

Oakland, CALocal News

The Oakland Department of Transportation is set to implement upgrades in Chinatown aimed at improving pedestrian safety through its "complete streets" plan. This includes widening sidewalks and introducing pedestrian scrambles, as noted by Stephanie Tran, the Chamber of Commerce president. Despite support for these enhancements, community members are apprehensive about lane reductions on streets like 9th, Harrison, and Webster. Local leader Jones Wu has expressed concerns that reduced vehicle lanes may impede access for parents picking up children and deter customers from local businesses. Wu has reached out to city officials, including director Josh Rowan, but has not received a follow-up.

Tran emphasizes the importance of a community-driven approach that addresses the needs of all stakeholders. The city’s efforts aim to balance safety with accessibility to maintain the vibrancy of Chinatown. The Oakland Department of Transportation has not provided comment for this report.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.