Sexual assault survivors in Oakland A guide to resources after BRAVE Bay Area

Oakland, CALocal News

BRAVE Bay Area announced it will permanently close at the end of September, creating a gap in support for sexual assault survivors in Oakland. Founded in 1971, BRAVE was the first rape crisis center in the U. S. and served as a national model for organizations supporting survivors of gender-based violence. Alleged financial mismanagement has led to this significant closure, which is a blow to those relying on its services.

Until its shutdown, BRAVE will continue to operate its hotline and service center on limited hours. Data from the Oakland Police Department indicates an average of 191 rape reports each year from 2020 to 2024, emphasizing the critical need for accessible support. Local agencies are now working to fill the void by offering resources such as legal aid and crisis lines. Survivors are encouraged to explore these options as they navigate their recovery. BRAVE’s closure underscores the ongoing challenges faced by organizations that support victims of sexual violence.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.