CA DMV claims Tesla misled drivers on Autopilot capabilities seeks to suspend business for 30 days

Oakland, CALocal News

The California Department of Motor Vehicles has filed a lawsuit against Tesla for allegedly misleading consumers regarding the self-driving capabilities of its vehicles. The DMV seeks a 30-day suspension of Tesla's sales and manufacturing in California, citing safety concerns from numerous crashes linked to its Autopilot feature. Activists rallied outside the Office of Administrative Hearings, emphasizing the dangers of Tesla's claims, with one activist stating, "These lies have killed 58 people. " UC Berkeley Professor Scott Moura clarified that Tesla's "fully self-driving" technology is classified as Level Two automation, which does not allow for complete driving independence. In contrast, levels Three to Five are categorized as truly autonomous according to California law.

Tesla contends that consumers are aware of the limitations of their Autopilot system, regardless of marketing claims. The lawsuit underscores the ongoing scrutiny of Tesla's practices and its implications for public safety. This legal action could further tarnish Tesla's reputation amid a series of negative news reports.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.