Jade Palace shuttered for equipment upgrades

Oakland, CALocal News

Jade Palace, a Chinese take-out restaurant in Oakland's Dimond District, faced a temporary closure on July 22 due to outdated equipment, as mandated by the Alameda County Department of Environmental Health. The restaurant's management confirmed that inspectors identified the need for upgrades, leading to the shutdown. They have since ordered new equipment, including an essential ice maker, to comply with health regulations. However, management anticipates it will take at least another week for installation and county approval before they can reopen. Located at 2531 MacArthur Blvd, Jade Palace is one of many local eateries navigating stringent health standards.

This incident reflects broader concerns regarding food safety compliance in the restaurant industry. Local patrons are awaiting the restaurant's reopening, emphasizing the impact of such closures on community dining options. Health inspections play a critical role in ensuring public safety and maintaining trust in local food establishments.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.