Can a new developer finally get Oak Knoll off the ground?

Oakland, CALocal News

Freehold Communities is making strides to kickstart the long-delayed Oak Knoll housing project in Oakland, with hopes to initiate construction on 290 homes by early 2026. The project, which includes a total of 918 homes and commercial spaces, has faced numerous delays since its initial approval nearly a decade ago. Factors such as high interest rates, soaring construction costs, and local permitting challenges have stalled progress. Brad Shuckhart, Freehold's regional president, noted the company's commitment to expedite the process by preparing home designs in advance for builders. The site, previously a naval hospital, has a complex history of ownership and redevelopment attempts, contributing to community frustrations.

Local residents have expressed disheartening feelings over the prolonged wait for housing development in their area. Freehold's success will depend on its ability to navigate market conditions and attract builders amid ongoing challenges. The future of the Oak Knoll project remains uncertain, but the developer aims for significant progress by 2026.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.