The fight over the future of Oaklands 45 million security contract continues

Oakland, CALocal News

Oakland City Council has delayed awarding a $45 million security contract, evaluating proposals from Allied Universal Security Services and Marina Security Services. Both companies sought to collaborate with Diligence Security Group, a local Black-owned business. A city spokesman noted staff are collaborating with the legal team to outline future steps, and a recommendation is expected in late September. In the interim, ABC Security Service's contract has been extended, despite concerns about its owner's ties to a corruption investigation. Councilmember Charlene Wang emphasized the importance of surfacing controversies related to the potential awardees.

The council's decision follows a report from the Department of Public Works that recommended Allied, raising questions about the evaluation process. The conflict highlights a significant divide between city staff and councilmembers over contract allocation. This ongoing debate underscores the challenges of balancing local business support with transparency in city contracts.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.