Federal oversight drags on as Oakland police struggle with internal investigations

Oakland, CALocal News

U. S. District Judge William Orrick announced that the Oakland Police Department (OPD) has made strides but has not reached full compliance with its federal oversight program after 22 years. Improvements include reduced racial profiling in traffic stops and the use of technology to combat crime. However, OPD has yet to meet three critical reforms regarding the timeliness and quality of internal investigations.

Orrick stressed that the department must enhance its ability to investigate officer misconduct to demonstrate it can operate independently. The oversight program originated from a 2003 civil rights lawsuit linked to the Riders scandal, where officers were accused of misconduct. OPD had been on track to exit the oversight but faced setbacks in 2023 due to internal investigation issues involving officers. The judge has mandated reforms to ensure the Internal Affairs Division reports directly to the police chief. He urged the department to complete its compliance swiftly to end the federal oversight.

Related Articles

Transit funding bill passes California Senate, heads to Gov. Newsom

California lawmakers unanimously approved Senate Bill 105, securing hundreds of millions in funding for transit agencies on the last day of the legislative session. Governor Newsom emphasized the importance of transit for millions of Californians and pledged to align flexible financing tools to support local agencies.

Stopping gun violence in Oakland on the podcast

Gun violence in Oakland is decreasing but remains a significant issue. The city funds civilian-led prevention programs, including the Ceasefire strategy and conflict mediation by violence interrupters, to further reduce incidents. The article also highlights community initiatives and the ongoing challenges of funding these programs.

Oakland official loses restraining order case against activist

An Alameda County judge denied Assistant City Administrator Harold Duffey's request for a restraining order against activist Seneca Scott, ruling he failed to prove threats or harm. Duffey accused Scott of making false claims about bribery and immunity, which he argued damaged his reputation as he seeks employment. Scott plans to pursue a First Amendment lawsuit in response.