Some University of Minnesota faculty criticize hiring second-in-command without any public meetings

Faculty at the University of Minnesota are raising concerns about the lack of transparency in the selection process for new provost Gretchen Ritter, who was appointed without public forums or interviews for candidates. Michael Gallope, a member of the search committee, noted that not allowing community input creates a trust deficit for the new academic leader. In previous searches, such as in 2011 and 2019, candidates engaged with the public, a practice not followed this year, prompting faculty worries. A university spokesperson defended the confidential process, stating it is standard across peer institutions to attract a larger pool of candidates. The search committee started with 49 applicants, which were narrowed down through interviews to four finalists.

Ritter previously served as provost at Syracuse University and will replace Rachel Croson, who faced a vote of no confidence from the Faculty Senate. The Board of Regents must approve Ritter's appointment, which is set for July 31, with a final decision expected on June 12. Concerns over academic freedom and trust in university leadership have heightened amid recent tensions related to the Israel-Hamas conflict.