Some University of Minnesota faculty oppose regents' resolution limiting public statements

The University of Minnesota's Board of Regents has introduced a resolution that has sparked significant backlash from faculty members who fear it restricts academic freedom and public discourse. More than 400 faculty members have signed a petition calling for the resolution's retraction, which limits official university statements to those sanctioned by the president. This controversy arises amid a national dialogue on academic freedom, intensified by recent global incidents, including the October 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas. Critics, including Karen Ho, an anthropology professor, contend that the resolution effectively positions the president as a "censor-in-chief," controlling what faculty can express on public issues. Although the board claims the resolution affirms free speech rights, many faculty members view it as a significant infringement on their professional responsibilities.

The University Senate has also passed a resolution urging the board to rescind its decision, highlighting the widespread concern within the academic community. Protests have emerged on campus, reflecting the urgency of the issue and the apprehension about its long-term effects on free speech. As the board prepares to finalize the resolution, the faculty's call for greater autonomy in public discourse remains a critical point of contention.