Man warns of unexpected DoorDash charge on food from Shoreline

Lynnwood, WALocal News

John Rumpelein from Edmonds reported being charged a $4. 99 fee labeled as a “SEA Regulatory Response Fee” on DoorDash orders from Shoreline restaurants, with 22 instances occurring between February and July 2025. Despite reaching out to DoorDash customer service for clarification and a refund, the fee persisted on his orders, notably from Jersey Mike’s. This charge relates to Seattle's PayUp ordinance, which guarantees app-based delivery workers a minimum wage, but it should not apply to Shoreline. Avalara, DoorDash's tax compliance provider, confirmed that Shoreline deliveries should not incur this fee due to a ZIP code overlap.

The City of Shoreline has not implemented this fee, which complicates the issue further. DoorDash's head of policy communications, Parker Dorrough, stated that the company plans to refine its fee structure to reduce confusion in such cases. Rumpelein's experience highlights the challenges faced by residents in areas sharing ZIP codes with larger cities. The resolution could lead to clearer fee structures for delivery services in similar jurisdictions.

Related Articles

Lego brick building event at Lynnwood Library Sept. 5

Lynnwood Library hosts a Lego brick building event on September 5, 2025, starting at 8:57 PM local time. The event encourages creativity and family bonding through building activities. Participants can enjoy a fun evening of Lego construction with fellow enthusiasts.

Volunteers sought for Sept. 6 Fair on 44th

Lynnwood's Health and Safety Community Block Party seeks volunteers for the Fair on 44th, scheduled for September 6. The event runs from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. on 44th Avenue West, which will be closed between 188th and 194th Streets Southwest.

Some Washington judges arent ordering accused abusers to surrender guns

A Washington Court of Appeals ruling has upheld the state's firearm surrender law, rejecting Brandon Montesi's argument that it violates his constitutional rights. Victim advocates hope the ruling will prompt greater enforcement of firearm surrender orders in domestic violence cases, despite ongoing hesitance among some judges.