Playing political Whac-A-Mole as issue of bond measure language pops up again

The article highlights the cyclical nature of political issues in California, particularly regarding bond measure language that misleads voters. It likens this to a game of Whac-A-Mole, where resolved issues resurface through legal loopholes. A key focus is on the state law that requires a 75-word summary for ballot measures, which has often been exploited by sponsors to obscure crucial financial details. The piece reflects on a historical context, referencing a 1975 law related to medical malpractice that has seen persistent attempts to modify it over the years. In 2015, Assemblymember Jay Obernolte sought to amend how ballot summaries are crafted, aiming for more transparency.

The author argues that voters deserve clear and honest information to make informed decisions. This commentary emphasizes the need for legislative accountability and transparency. By addressing these persistent issues, the article advocates for a more informed electorate in California.