Reader view Responding to the top 10 false claims about Prop 1

As ballots for Prop 1 arrive in Edmonds, local supporters counter misinformation from the No on Prop 1 group by debunking ten common claims. They assert that claims about Edmonds becoming the most expensive city and having a spending problem are inaccurate, as the city operates more efficiently than comparably sized cities. The supporters clarify that the alleged loss of $4. 5 million is unfounded, citing annual audits by the Washington State Auditor’s Office. They emphasize that only $1 million of the claimed $79 million in reserves is available for transfer, with the rest earmarked for specific uses.

Prop 1 also exempts low-income seniors and disabled residents, addressing concerns that it will increase their tax burden. The group points to a McKinstry report that found public facilities in poor condition, underscoring the need for funding to maintain essential services. They argue that failure to pass Prop 1 could lead to significant cuts, including reductions in police and parks funding. Supporters encourage voters to prioritize community safety and services by voting Yes on Prop 1.